Wednesday, August 22, 2007

Wanted: Tulsi or Parvati

I read an article in the newspaper today that reported a most bizarre trend. It seems more and more men these days are advertising on matrimonial sites such as shaadi.com, for women who would have the attributes of ‘Tulsi’ from ‘Kyunki saas bhi kabhi bahu thi’ or ‘Parvati’ from ‘Kahani ghar ghar ki’!
Its incredible, beyond both belief and comprehension, that such thing should be happening. Though I suspect I have only myself to blame for being so shocked. This was bound to happen sooner or later. We have all seen how popular these serials have become over the last few years. And how they continue to retain their popularity in spite of having way outlived their original plot lines, and jumped several generations.


Smriti Irani’s easy foray into politics and the way people continue to identify her with her on screen avatar, was already an indication of how these worlds of make believe had entered our lives in a direct way. And it was only a matter of time, before the common man would want to embrace these notions created by the television. Men desiring these seemingly perfect demi goddesses such as Parvatis and Tulsis all for themselves, was I guess, inevitable. After all haven’t people always fantasized about filmstars?
What is it that makes them so very popular, I wonder. You see, we have always had a very rich filmmaking tradition. In terms of sheer volume, as measured in the number of films made in a year, Bollywood is the largest filmmaking industry in the world. Of course our budgets being what they are, it still doesn’t come close to Hollywood in size or income generated.
People in this country obviously value entertainment, and don’t mind paying for it. I guess it is only to be expected. At the end of a long, hard day (and I am somehow inclined to believe that a long, hard day in the life of an Indian would be a lot more taxing than that in the life of someone from a more developed country) the common man would be looking for some entertainment. So we have had a long tradition of films which would invariably have two parallel tracks, the main storyline, and a parallel loveline. No matter how strong a theme the film has, it has to have a love angle, and a few songs to showcase it, for it to succeed. Of course there has been a whole parallel movement of serious, thoughtful cinema, as also crossover cinema, in recent times, that manages to stay true to its core theme while still making some amount of profit, bridging the gap between the so called ‘art’ and ‘commercial’ films. But that is not the subject under discussion here, so I’ll refrain from going deeper. Maybe another day, another post.
The funny thing that I notice though is that as films get raunchier and more explicit, in their depiction of women, sex and violence, television on the other hand is going the other way. More and more we see women sexier and with better toned bodies, sporting shorter skirts and lower necklines, on the big screen, while the small screen in inundated with the stereotypical ‘bhartiya nari’, complete with the nine yard sari (or in other cases, salwar kameez), sindoor, mangalsutra and an undying love and devotion to the husband and family.
It’s the same country, isn’t it? And the same people? Oh sure the target audiences might be different. But surely they can’t be that different?
Further what I find rather hard to believe is how Indian audiences, especially women, are gobbling up all the scheming and politics within the family that seems to be the plotline for most of the serials on television. What is it that’s making these rather regressive serials work? Is it aspirational value? For they all them seem to living in palatial homes and doing businesses with mutlicrore turnovers. The women invariably wear designer sarees, are loaded with jewellery and always, but always, look like a million bucks even if they’ve just woken up from sleep. Is it a reflection of people’s aspirations, of what they would rather have in their own lives, that they watch and relish this entirely unbelievable rubbish?
Or is it truly a reflection of our society? Are our families, especially joint families, actually this ridden with jealousy and politics? And all the plot lines actually drawn from reality and spruced up with a good looking facade to make it sell better?
Or maybe it’s a both and more, a complex combination of many factors that ultimately works. Maybe I should contact Ekta Kapoor for answers to some of these questions. I have a feeling she has it all figured!

3 comments:

upali said...

Amazing.
Here's something else I heard- a research project conducted by one of the US universities shows that these soaps are actuallt empowering rural women--- women are now more confidence and also less anxious to have male offsprings! Who knew!

I think the sheer lack of logic is eclipsed by the matriarchal figure that emerges-- which in the guise of the good bahu and ma, is in effect pulling all the strings.

poosha said...

wow!
a. for that finding.
b. for the fact that a university in the US is conducting such a study, in another country.
Findings such as these are mindboggling, and makes me reconsider the way I viewed things all along. Can something good really come out of something so regressive? And if that’s really happening, maybe we also need to study and identify exactly what it is that is leading to these results. Difficult analysis it must be, and I wonder how far the study got in understanding this trend.
The matriarchal figure is the key element, you see Upali. I don’t know how much of these serials you have been able to see considering that you are in the US. Not that I can claim to have much better being right here, but from whatever little I have, my reading is that the common denominator in all the serials doing the rounds is exactly that- a or several strong female protagonists. Is that what its about then? Are we witnessing a female revolution of sorts, the Indian woman coming into her own?
Another little nugget of information: last year in an article carried by India Today, on Ekta Kapoor and her mostly female production house, she is reported to have said, “The men in my office are like the men in my serials- props.” ☺

Unknown said...

its not difficult to gauge the direction that the big and small screens are taking once you see their target audience .. if i'm not mistaken, most of the crowd going to see the big screen is dominated by the 15-30 year old category .. we all know how the hormones rage during that period .. : ) .. enter shorter skirts, no skirts, topless hunks etc etc etc .. on the other hand, most of the ppl staying at home are housewives who have been cooped up for ages and are desperate to bring meaning to their life in any way they can .. did you know that most housewives are perenially ill with one mysterious ailment or the other ? .. its their way of attracting attention .. or that most housewives do not let servants do all the work lest their importance in the house gets undermined ? .. and in such a background enters the soap opera culture .. saas .. bahu .. politics .. adultery .. scandal .. power .. gives the housewife some sort of excitement and purpose in her life .. makes her imagine how she would be in the designer saree, wearking makeup, having that toned body, and getting her husband to jump all the hoops like in the soap (instead of reality, where situations are just that, real life ones with lots of justified or unjustified sacrifices and adjustment) .. makes her feel in control .. hence the huge fan following amongst women .. i see so many women discussing these stories and characters with an emotion that seems to imply that the characters are living souls whom these women meet every day! .. of course, males see these soaps too and a stereotype that always existed in their mind since the start of time starts taking a solid shape, namely that of the characters of the soap .. ki i don't want this woman who schemes so much and plots behind her husband's back .. i would rather go for that sweet beautiful docile housemaker who keeps the family together, makes sacrifices, dabaos my feet every evening and so on .. sort of langoor ke haath mein angoor wali story .. it rarely turns out to be true .. :D ..

so, really speaking, the big and the small screens only show what their audience wants to see, rather than what reality is .. reality is "Guru" .. reality is "Udaan" .. reality is "Mother India" .. reality is "Baghbaan" .. reality is "Satya" .. and for all such movies, serials, and commentaries, one will find an audience across all demographies ..

so there's no contradiction as such .. every section of the society percieves its own reality and the media reinforces this reality for each of those sections individually ..

PS: didn't really comment on the newspaper article as i haven't seen it .. i'm guessing it was the TOI or mumbai times that wrote it .. only they can write an article about guys using the traits of women characters in matrimonial ads ..